Interpleader Lawyer

$306,100 Corebridge life insurance interpleader won

Corebridge  life insurance Interpleader Beneficiary Dispute

Alex had a life insurance policy naming his ex-wife, Sarah, as the primary beneficiary. After their divorce, Alex remarried to Emily, but again forgot to update his beneficiary designation on the policy. Later, Alex also had a child, Max, from a previous relationship, but he never updated his policy to include Max as a beneficiary.

When Alex passed away, three individuals made claims to the life insurance proceeds: Sarah, Emily, and Max. Sarah argued that she was still the rightful beneficiary because the policy hadn’t been updated after the divorce. Emily claimed that as Alex’s current spouse, she should receive the proceeds. Max, on the other hand, argued that he should be entitled to a portion of the proceeds as Alex’s child.

In this complex situation, the insurance company would likely file an interpleader lawsuit. They would deposit the life insurance proceeds with the court and name Sarah, Emily, and Max as defendants.

During the lawsuit, each claimant would present evidence supporting their claim to the proceeds. Sarah would argue that the failure to update the beneficiary designation after the divorce meant she was still entitled to the proceeds. Emily would present evidence of her marriage to Alex and argue that as his current spouse, she should receive the benefits. Max would present evidence of his relationship to Alex as his child and argue that he should receive a portion of the proceeds as well.

The court would then have to consider various factors, including the validity of the beneficiary designation, the laws governing beneficiary designations in cases of divorce and remarriage, the laws regarding inheritance by children, and any other relevant evidence.
Ultimately, the court would make a decision as to how to distribute the life insurance proceeds among the competing claimants. This complex interpleader lawsuit helps ensure that the funds are distributed fairly and in accordance with the law, given the multiple competing interests involved.

Contact us